<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 222 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82808</link>
    <description>Section 35E cannot be used to sustain an excise demand on a ground not raised in the show cause notice or decided in adjudication. Where the notice alleged only that goods were not inputs for the final product, a separate objection that their value was not included in the assessable value could not be introduced later at the appellate stage. A new ground needing further factual inquiry cannot be added by remand when it was never part of the original notice or order. The appellate order was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:47:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 222 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82808</link>
      <description>Section 35E cannot be used to sustain an excise demand on a ground not raised in the show cause notice or decided in adjudication. Where the notice alleged only that goods were not inputs for the final product, a separate objection that their value was not included in the assessable value could not be introduced later at the appellate stage. A new ground needing further factual inquiry cannot be added by remand when it was never part of the original notice or order. The appellate order was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>