<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 219 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Department, remanding the case back to the Collector. The Collector was directed to provide copies of invoices for verification, consider all evidence from the Show Cause Notice, and allow cross-examination of deponents. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a fair adjudication process, ensuring all relevant evidence is reviewed and both parties have a fair chance to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:43:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 219 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Department, remanding the case back to the Collector. The Collector was directed to provide copies of invoices for verification, consider all evidence from the Show Cause Notice, and allow cross-examination of deponents. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a fair adjudication process, ensuring all relevant evidence is reviewed and both parties have a fair chance to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>