<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 215 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82801</link>
    <description>A manufacturer covered by the excise licensing relaxation was required to apply for a Central Excise licence when 80% of the exemption limit was reached. Because the manufacturer applied before crossing that threshold, the duty to suspend manufacture pending actual grant of the licence did not arise. On that factual basis, the record showed no breach of the applicable licensing condition under the exemption notification and the related rules, so penalty was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:36:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 215 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82801</link>
      <description>A manufacturer covered by the excise licensing relaxation was required to apply for a Central Excise licence when 80% of the exemption limit was reached. Because the manufacturer applied before crossing that threshold, the duty to suspend manufacture pending actual grant of the licence did not arise. On that factual basis, the record showed no breach of the applicable licensing condition under the exemption notification and the related rules, so penalty was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>