https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82796 Delay in filing the appeals was condoned because the papers were misplaced by the excise clerk and later recovered, with affidavit and documents showing the lapse was not wanton or deliberate on the proprietor's part. One stay application became infructuous after the disputed amount had already been deposited. In the remaining stay application, the applicants were directed to make a further cash deposit within the stipulated time, failing which the appeal would be liable to rejection; upon compliance, stay of recovery of the balance and waiver of recovery were granted. en-us Mon, 13 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:22:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82796 Delay in filing the appeals was condoned because the papers were misplaced by the excise clerk and later recovered, with affidavit and documents showing the lapse was not wanton or deliberate on the proprietor's part. One stay application became infructuous after the disputed amount had already been deposited. In the remaining stay application, the applicants were directed to make a further cash deposit within the stipulated time, failing which the appeal would be liable to rejection; upon compliance, stay of recovery of the balance and waiver of recovery were granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82796