<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 204 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82790</link>
    <description>Caustic soda lye and flakes used to wash glass bottles before filling aerated water were treated as inputs used in relation to manufacture, because the cleaning stage was a necessary and integral part of preparing the excisable final product for clearance and marketing. The phrase &quot;in relation to&quot; was given a wide meaning, and the statutory definition of manufacture supported that broader reading. Modvat credit was therefore admissible, and the order denying credit was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 204 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82790</link>
      <description>Caustic soda lye and flakes used to wash glass bottles before filling aerated water were treated as inputs used in relation to manufacture, because the cleaning stage was a necessary and integral part of preparing the excisable final product for clearance and marketing. The phrase &quot;in relation to&quot; was given a wide meaning, and the statutory definition of manufacture supported that broader reading. Modvat credit was therefore admissible, and the order denying credit was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>