https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82769 Alleged misconduct of a Customs House Agent can be proceeded against under Regulation 21(c) read with Regulation 23 where the notice expressly alleges unbecoming conduct, and Regulation 22 is not the exclusive route. Statements of passengers recorded in other proceedings were inadmissible because they were not examined in the inquiry or made available for cross-examination, and a retracted statement of the proprietor required independent corroboration that was absent. No express prohibition barred a CHA from also acting as a shipping or consolidating agent, so that concurrent business alone did not constitute misconduct. The revocation of the temporary licence and forfeiture of security were therefore unsustainable. en-us Thu, 13 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:08:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82769 Alleged misconduct of a Customs House Agent can be proceeded against under Regulation 21(c) read with Regulation 23 where the notice expressly alleges unbecoming conduct, and Regulation 22 is not the exclusive route. Statements of passengers recorded in other proceedings were inadmissible because they were not examined in the inquiry or made available for cross-examination, and a retracted statement of the proprietor required independent corroboration that was absent. No express prohibition barred a CHA from also acting as a shipping or consolidating agent, so that concurrent business alone did not constitute misconduct. The revocation of the temporary licence and forfeiture of security were therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 13 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82769