<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 201 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82745</link>
    <description>Only a decision or order passed by an adjudicating authority in exercise of statutory adjudicatory powers is appealable under Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act. A communication merely refusing to issue a detention certificate was treated as an administrative action consequential to alleged detention of goods, not as an adjudicatory order made under the Act. It therefore did not fall within the class of orders covered by Section 122 and was not appealable before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:06:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 201 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82745</link>
      <description>Only a decision or order passed by an adjudicating authority in exercise of statutory adjudicatory powers is appealable under Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act. A communication merely refusing to issue a detention certificate was treated as an administrative action consequential to alleged detention of goods, not as an adjudicatory order made under the Act. It therefore did not fall within the class of orders covered by Section 122 and was not appealable before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>