<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 160 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82740</link>
    <description>Coated abrasive used for smoothening wooden articles was treated as a tool, or as part of machinery, rather than a mere consumable. Because its actual use brought it within the exclusion in the explanation to Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, it did not qualify as an input for MODVAT credit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal therefore succeeded, and credit was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:49:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 160 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82740</link>
      <description>Coated abrasive used for smoothening wooden articles was treated as a tool, or as part of machinery, rather than a mere consumable. Because its actual use brought it within the exclusion in the explanation to Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, it did not qualify as an input for MODVAT credit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal therefore succeeded, and credit was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>