<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 188 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82701</link>
    <description>The Regional Bench was held not competent to finally decide the availability of exemption notifications, as that question had to be taken up by the Special Bench. The matters were therefore sent back for consideration by the Special Bench, clarifying the forum-specific jurisdiction for deciding the exemption issue and directing that the appeals be placed before the appropriate bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:53:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 188 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82701</link>
      <description>The Regional Bench was held not competent to finally decide the availability of exemption notifications, as that question had to be taken up by the Special Bench. The matters were therefore sent back for consideration by the Special Bench, clarifying the forum-specific jurisdiction for deciding the exemption issue and directing that the appeals be placed before the appropriate bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>