https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82697 Pending appeal, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for stay and waiver because the labels and monograms, on first impression, did not conclusively show brand-name marketing or manufacturer identification. The goods were treated as pharmacopoeial products not marketed under a brand name, and the label colours were noted to be used by other manufacturers. The separate monogram was not regarded as decisive at that stage. The applicants were required to furnish a personal bond for the duty amount within the stipulated time and report compliance; on compliance, recovery was stayed and waiver of duty was granted. en-us Tue, 07 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:50:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82697 Pending appeal, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for stay and waiver because the labels and monograms, on first impression, did not conclusively show brand-name marketing or manufacturer identification. The goods were treated as pharmacopoeial products not marketed under a brand name, and the label colours were noted to be used by other manufacturers. The separate monogram was not regarded as decisive at that stage. The applicants were required to furnish a personal bond for the duty amount within the stipulated time and report compliance; on compliance, recovery was stayed and waiver of duty was granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82697