<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82693</link>
    <description>For refund limitation, duty paid by debit in the personal ledger account is treated as effective payment, so the limitation period runs from the date of such payment and not from the later finalisation of RT-12 returns. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court&#039;s view on the relevant date for refund claims and applied that principle to hold the claim within limitation. On that basis, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:44:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82693</link>
      <description>For refund limitation, duty paid by debit in the personal ledger account is treated as effective payment, so the limitation period runs from the date of such payment and not from the later finalisation of RT-12 returns. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court&#039;s view on the relevant date for refund claims and applied that principle to hold the claim within limitation. On that basis, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>