<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82688</link>
    <description>Finished leather in the form of strips and slabs was found by the lower authorities, so the broader classification dispute between leather scrap and the relevant tariff entry did not require determination. Because exemption under Notification No. 136/92-Cus. had not been claimed or examined below, eligibility under that notification required fresh consideration. The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional Assistant Collector to decide the exemption claim after giving the appellants an opportunity of being heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:34:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82688</link>
      <description>Finished leather in the form of strips and slabs was found by the lower authorities, so the broader classification dispute between leather scrap and the relevant tariff entry did not require determination. Because exemption under Notification No. 136/92-Cus. had not been claimed or examined below, eligibility under that notification required fresh consideration. The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional Assistant Collector to decide the exemption claim after giving the appellants an opportunity of being heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>