<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 175 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82683</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on synthetic rubber and rubber chemicals used to make rubber compound, because the compound formed a component of insulated wires and cables and was used in relation to manufacture of the dutiable final product. The fact that the compound was separately manufactured, or that an intermediate exempt product emerged, did not by itself defeat credit under Rule 57D. On the facts stated, the extended period and penalty were also not justified because the inputs had been declared and suppression was not made out. The Department&#039;s reference application was rejected as misconceived in light of the Tribunal&#039;s final order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 175 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82683</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on synthetic rubber and rubber chemicals used to make rubber compound, because the compound formed a component of insulated wires and cables and was used in relation to manufacture of the dutiable final product. The fact that the compound was separately manufactured, or that an intermediate exempt product emerged, did not by itself defeat credit under Rule 57D. On the facts stated, the extended period and penalty were also not justified because the inputs had been declared and suppression was not made out. The Department&#039;s reference application was rejected as misconceived in light of the Tribunal&#039;s final order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>