<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned Orders-in-Appeal and allowed all appeals, providing relief to the appellants regarding the seizure and confiscation of Urea. The judgment clarified the presumption of duty payment on goods purchased from the open market for industrial use, aligning with previous High Court decisions. The burden on purchasers to prove duty payment was deemed unreasonable, emphasizing established legal principles and granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:37:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned Orders-in-Appeal and allowed all appeals, providing relief to the appellants regarding the seizure and confiscation of Urea. The judgment clarified the presumption of duty payment on goods purchased from the open market for industrial use, aligning with previous High Court decisions. The burden on purchasers to prove duty payment was deemed unreasonable, emphasizing established legal principles and granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>