https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82670 The Tribunal found that carbide sludge lacked a distinctive name and use, and the evidence presented for marketability was insufficient. The matter was remanded to the Collector (Appeals) for a fresh examination to determine excisability under the Central Excise Act. The Collector was directed to pass an appropriate order after reevaluating the issue. The appeals were allowed by way of remand for further assessment. en-us Thu, 05 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:36:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82670 The Tribunal found that carbide sludge lacked a distinctive name and use, and the evidence presented for marketability was insufficient. The matter was remanded to the Collector (Appeals) for a fresh examination to determine excisability under the Central Excise Act. The Collector was directed to pass an appropriate order after reevaluating the issue. The appeals were allowed by way of remand for further assessment. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82670