<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as time-barred due to the delay in filing and rejected the condonation application. It found that the delay was primarily caused by the Clearing Agents&#039; inaction and emphasized the importance of explaining each day&#039;s delay. The Tribunal held that the Principal is bound by the actions of the Agent, attributing the delay to the Agents&#039; negligence in forwarding the order. Despite the applicants&#039; contentions, discrepancies in their statements and lack of sufficient cause for the delay led to the rejection of the condonation application and the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:18:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as time-barred due to the delay in filing and rejected the condonation application. It found that the delay was primarily caused by the Clearing Agents&#039; inaction and emphasized the importance of explaining each day&#039;s delay. The Tribunal held that the Principal is bound by the actions of the Agent, attributing the delay to the Agents&#039; negligence in forwarding the order. Despite the applicants&#039; contentions, discrepancies in their statements and lack of sufficient cause for the delay led to the rejection of the condonation application and the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>