https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82658 The Tribunal rejected the modification application seeking to separate the clearances of two distinct limited companies, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination during the main appeal. It upheld the decision to club the clearances, citing the importance of preventing duty evasion by lifting the corporate veil. The Tribunal extended the time for pre-deposit of duty amount, warning of consequences for non-compliance. A second stay application was also denied, reiterating the necessity of maintaining separate legal identities to avoid clubbing of clearances, with a directive to deposit the duty amount promptly to avoid dismissal of appeals. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:02:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82658 The Tribunal rejected the modification application seeking to separate the clearances of two distinct limited companies, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination during the main appeal. It upheld the decision to club the clearances, citing the importance of preventing duty evasion by lifting the corporate veil. The Tribunal extended the time for pre-deposit of duty amount, warning of consequences for non-compliance. A second stay application was also denied, reiterating the necessity of maintaining separate legal identities to avoid clubbing of clearances, with a directive to deposit the duty amount promptly to avoid dismissal of appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82658