<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 181 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82654</link>
    <description>Para 4(b) of Notification No. 175/86-C.E. turns on the identity of the manufacturer and whether exemption was availed in the preceding financial year; a later change in factory address recorded in the SSI registration certificate is only procedural and does not by itself defeat the benefit. Where the manufacturer remained the same and the revised address was later incorporated without cancellation of the original registration, the certificate continued to operate from its original date. The exemption could not be denied merely because the shifted premises were not immediately reflected in the amended address, and the benefit remained available where otherwise admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:45:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 181 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82654</link>
      <description>Para 4(b) of Notification No. 175/86-C.E. turns on the identity of the manufacturer and whether exemption was availed in the preceding financial year; a later change in factory address recorded in the SSI registration certificate is only procedural and does not by itself defeat the benefit. Where the manufacturer remained the same and the revised address was later incorporated without cancellation of the original registration, the certificate continued to operate from its original date. The exemption could not be denied merely because the shifted premises were not immediately reflected in the amended address, and the benefit remained available where otherwise admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>