<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 180 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82651</link>
    <description>The appeals involved confiscation of Indian currency and foreign goods by the Collector of Customs, alleging illicit importation or sale proceeds of smuggled goods. In &quot;Kalyani Saha&#039;s Case,&quot; the burden of proof was on the department to show currency origins, leading to relief for Kalyani Saha. &quot;Jhunu Rani Saha&#039;s Case&quot; saw penalties set aside due to lack of evidence. In &quot;Nandalal Saha&#039;s Case,&quot; confiscation was deemed illegal without proof of currency origin. A violation of natural justice led to remand for fair consideration. The judgment emphasizes burden of proof, evidence requirements for penalties, and natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:28:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 180 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82651</link>
      <description>The appeals involved confiscation of Indian currency and foreign goods by the Collector of Customs, alleging illicit importation or sale proceeds of smuggled goods. In &quot;Kalyani Saha&#039;s Case,&quot; the burden of proof was on the department to show currency origins, leading to relief for Kalyani Saha. &quot;Jhunu Rani Saha&#039;s Case&quot; saw penalties set aside due to lack of evidence. In &quot;Nandalal Saha&#039;s Case,&quot; confiscation was deemed illegal without proof of currency origin. A violation of natural justice led to remand for fair consideration. The judgment emphasizes burden of proof, evidence requirements for penalties, and natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>