<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82595</link>
    <description>The appeals concerning the classification of &quot;Hose Assembly&quot; were dismissed on the issue of challenging previous decisions but remanded for reconsideration on whether the product was made of hardened or unhardened rubber. The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s authority to take a different view in subsequent assessments and stressed the significance of material composition for accurate classification under tariff headings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:12:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82595</link>
      <description>The appeals concerning the classification of &quot;Hose Assembly&quot; were dismissed on the issue of challenging previous decisions but remanded for reconsideration on whether the product was made of hardened or unhardened rubber. The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s authority to take a different view in subsequent assessments and stressed the significance of material composition for accurate classification under tariff headings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>