<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 142 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82582</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the imported goods, declared as &quot;Luminous Pigment&quot; for X-Ray screens, were correctly classified under Heading 32.04 as luminophores. The decision overturned the Collector (Appeals) classification under Heading 28.47, highlighting the significance of precise classification based on the characteristics and intended use of the goods, supported by documentary evidence and statutory notes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 142 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82582</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the imported goods, declared as &quot;Luminous Pigment&quot; for X-Ray screens, were correctly classified under Heading 32.04 as luminophores. The decision overturned the Collector (Appeals) classification under Heading 28.47, highlighting the significance of precise classification based on the characteristics and intended use of the goods, supported by documentary evidence and statutory notes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>