<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82565</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s order, rejecting the appeal. It was determined that the imported goods were correctly classified as Ivory Board, not covered by the import licenses under the DEEC Scheme, and the appellants were not entitled to exemption from duty. The tribunal found no merit in the appellants&#039; arguments regarding the violation of principles of natural justice and the interpretation of import licenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82565</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s order, rejecting the appeal. It was determined that the imported goods were correctly classified as Ivory Board, not covered by the import licenses under the DEEC Scheme, and the appellants were not entitled to exemption from duty. The tribunal found no merit in the appellants&#039; arguments regarding the violation of principles of natural justice and the interpretation of import licenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>