<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 166 - BEFORE THE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82559</link>
    <description>Where ferro manganese slag was partly sold and partly captively consumed, the assessable value for captive consumption had to follow the genuine wholesale factory-gate price of comparable goods. Customer-specific contract prices for limited quantities under special conditions could not displace an available approved wholesale price, especially where higher-priced supplies reflected extra processing and expense not incurred for the captively consumed material. The valuation rules did not justify using an isolated contract price when a reasonable wholesale benchmark existed. Accordingly, the captive value was to be taken at the approved wholesale rate, and the higher valuation based on special sales was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:27:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 166 - BEFORE THE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82559</link>
      <description>Where ferro manganese slag was partly sold and partly captively consumed, the assessable value for captive consumption had to follow the genuine wholesale factory-gate price of comparable goods. Customer-specific contract prices for limited quantities under special conditions could not displace an available approved wholesale price, especially where higher-priced supplies reflected extra processing and expense not incurred for the captively consumed material. The valuation rules did not justify using an isolated contract price when a reasonable wholesale benchmark existed. Accordingly, the captive value was to be taken at the approved wholesale rate, and the higher valuation based on special sales was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>