<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 268 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the rectification of mistake application due to deliberate misrepresentations, misinterpretations of legal principles, and the lack of relevance of cited judgments to the present case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of honesty and accuracy in legal submissions, concluding that the application lacked merit based on a detailed analysis of the errors raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 268 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the rectification of mistake application due to deliberate misrepresentations, misinterpretations of legal principles, and the lack of relevance of cited judgments to the present case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of honesty and accuracy in legal submissions, concluding that the application lacked merit based on a detailed analysis of the errors raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>