https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82537 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for short payment of duty, ruling that the extended period under Section 11A did not apply. The appellants' argument on time bar was accepted, with the Tribunal finding no suppression or intentional diversion by the authorities. The demand, issued beyond the six-month period, was deemed impermissible, leading to the relief of the appellants from the demand. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:27:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82537 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for short payment of duty, ruling that the extended period under Section 11A did not apply. The appellants' argument on time bar was accepted, with the Tribunal finding no suppression or intentional diversion by the authorities. The demand, issued beyond the six-month period, was deemed impermissible, leading to the relief of the appellants from the demand. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82537