<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 135 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82536</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Collector (Appeals) for a fresh decision. It emphasized considering the earlier valid refund direction and ensuring benefits available at the transaction time are not denied due to notification changes. The decision highlighted the importance of past tribunal rulings for guidance on refund claims, statutory interpretation, and exemption notification application amidst evolving regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:26:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 135 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82536</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Collector (Appeals) for a fresh decision. It emphasized considering the earlier valid refund direction and ensuring benefits available at the transaction time are not denied due to notification changes. The decision highlighted the importance of past tribunal rulings for guidance on refund claims, statutory interpretation, and exemption notification application amidst evolving regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>