<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication. The adjudicating authority was directed to indicate the proposed classification and receive the appellants&#039; reply, ensuring the appellants&#039; right to be heard. The correct classification must be determined before deciding on redemption fine and personal penalty. One member concurred, emphasizing that failure to disclose the classification violated natural justice and caused undue hardship to importers. Both impugned orders were overturned, and the appeals were allowed for fresh adjudication with proper classification disclosure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:36:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication. The adjudicating authority was directed to indicate the proposed classification and receive the appellants&#039; reply, ensuring the appellants&#039; right to be heard. The correct classification must be determined before deciding on redemption fine and personal penalty. One member concurred, emphasizing that failure to disclose the classification violated natural justice and caused undue hardship to importers. Both impugned orders were overturned, and the appeals were allowed for fresh adjudication with proper classification disclosure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>