https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82500 The Tribunal granted an unconditional stay for the applicants, except for the quantity of heating elements cleared as such other than for captive consumption. The majority opinion found that the applicants had a strong prima facie case based on the interpretation of the relevant notification, granting the stay in their favor. The dissenting opinion raised concerns regarding non-disclosure and lack of evidence of financial hardship but was overruled by the majority decision. en-us Thu, 14 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:27:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82500 The Tribunal granted an unconditional stay for the applicants, except for the quantity of heating elements cleared as such other than for captive consumption. The majority opinion found that the applicants had a strong prima facie case based on the interpretation of the relevant notification, granting the stay in their favor. The dissenting opinion raised concerns regarding non-disclosure and lack of evidence of financial hardship but was overruled by the majority decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82500