<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 205 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82462</link>
    <description>The tribunal denied the petitioner&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit of a differential duty, amounting to Rs. 95,86,883, imposed by the Collector of Customs. The petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification 349/86 was rejected based on the presence of only one electronic part, the paper end sensor assembly, in the imported goods. The tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the petitioner did not qualify for exemption. The petitioner was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 25,00,000 by a specified date, with the balance amount&#039;s pre-deposit waived pending appeal, and the recovery of the balance amount was stayed pending compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 205 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82462</link>
      <description>The tribunal denied the petitioner&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit of a differential duty, amounting to Rs. 95,86,883, imposed by the Collector of Customs. The petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption under Notification 349/86 was rejected based on the presence of only one electronic part, the paper end sensor assembly, in the imported goods. The tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the petitioner did not qualify for exemption. The petitioner was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 25,00,000 by a specified date, with the balance amount&#039;s pre-deposit waived pending appeal, and the recovery of the balance amount was stayed pending compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>