<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 237 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82459</link>
    <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. The base paint and catalyst, when sold together, do not constitute a single excisable item until mixed by the consumer. No separate duty is leviable on the catalyst purchased from the market. The case was remanded for reconsideration of the time bar aspect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 237 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82459</link>
      <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. The base paint and catalyst, when sold together, do not constitute a single excisable item until mixed by the consumer. No separate duty is leviable on the catalyst purchased from the market. The case was remanded for reconsideration of the time bar aspect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>