<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82458</link>
    <description>Cinder generated in cement manufacture was held not excisable under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff up to 1-3-1984, because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling on the same classification issue and found the factual position materially identical. On that basis, the residuary tariff entry could not be applied to treat cinder as a dutiable excisable product, and the demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:18:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82458</link>
      <description>Cinder generated in cement manufacture was held not excisable under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff up to 1-3-1984, because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling on the same classification issue and found the factual position materially identical. On that basis, the residuary tariff entry could not be applied to treat cinder as a dutiable excisable product, and the demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>