<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 232 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82454</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that re-recording on blank video cassettes, despite prior content, constituted manufacturing. The inclusion of video cassettes in the tariff heading encompassed recording images, making it excisable. The tribunal rejected the argument that re-recording did not amount to manufacturing, emphasizing legislative intent and a Supreme Court judgment. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that re-recording blank cassettes falls under excise duty obligations as manufacturing, irrespective of content repetition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:11:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 232 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82454</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that re-recording on blank video cassettes, despite prior content, constituted manufacturing. The inclusion of video cassettes in the tariff heading encompassed recording images, making it excisable. The tribunal rejected the argument that re-recording did not amount to manufacturing, emphasizing legislative intent and a Supreme Court judgment. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that re-recording blank cassettes falls under excise duty obligations as manufacturing, irrespective of content repetition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>