https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82448 The Tribunal noted that an earlier order granting the benefit of Notification No. 125/86-Cus. had been challenged by the department, but no stay order was produced. On that basis, it treated the earlier order as remaining operative and held that the departmental authorities were bound to implement it. As the refund-related direction had not been acted upon despite service of the application, the Tribunal required compliance within a fixed time. The operative effect was that the assessee obtained enforcement of the earlier refund order in the absence of any stay. en-us Mon, 20 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:50:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82448 The Tribunal noted that an earlier order granting the benefit of Notification No. 125/86-Cus. had been challenged by the department, but no stay order was produced. On that basis, it treated the earlier order as remaining operative and held that the departmental authorities were bound to implement it. As the refund-related direction had not been acted upon despite service of the application, the Tribunal required compliance within a fixed time. The operative effect was that the assessee obtained enforcement of the earlier refund order in the absence of any stay. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82448