<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82430</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants the refund for excess duty paid under Tariff Item 14DD. The decision emphasized that duty paid under protest should be refunded without considering it as profit in the assessable value. The Tribunal found the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision to reopen the claim and treat a portion as profit unjustified, noting that if the Revenue disagreed, they should have appealed instead of reopening the case. The ruling highlighted the importance of legal procedures and precedents in refund claim adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:00:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82430</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants the refund for excess duty paid under Tariff Item 14DD. The decision emphasized that duty paid under protest should be refunded without considering it as profit in the assessable value. The Tribunal found the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision to reopen the claim and treat a portion as profit unjustified, noting that if the Revenue disagreed, they should have appealed instead of reopening the case. The ruling highlighted the importance of legal procedures and precedents in refund claim adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>