<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 289 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for further consideration, allowing the appellant to present alternative valid licenses. The Collector was directed to reassess the validity of the imports based on these licenses and the Tribunal&#039;s previous rulings. The appeal was disposed of with these observations, providing the appellant an opportunity to substantiate their claims regarding the licenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 10:47:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 289 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for further consideration, allowing the appellant to present alternative valid licenses. The Collector was directed to reassess the validity of the imports based on these licenses and the Tribunal&#039;s previous rulings. The appeal was disposed of with these observations, providing the appellant an opportunity to substantiate their claims regarding the licenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>