https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82420 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the release of the goods to the appellant after determining that the imported goods were properly classified as wool waste containing woollen yarn. The Tribunal emphasized the department's burden of proof, the importance of test reports, and the necessity for thorough verification beyond mere physical examination. The decision highlighted the rejection of the department's request for remand due to time constraints and lack of proof that the hank yarn was not waste, ultimately leading to the release of the goods to the appellant. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2011 10:30:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82420 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering the release of the goods to the appellant after determining that the imported goods were properly classified as wool waste containing woollen yarn. The Tribunal emphasized the department's burden of proof, the importance of test reports, and the necessity for thorough verification beyond mere physical examination. The decision highlighted the rejection of the department's request for remand due to time constraints and lack of proof that the hank yarn was not waste, ultimately leading to the release of the goods to the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82420