<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 208 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82414</link>
    <description>An adjudication order that failed to address the appellants&#039; limitation plea, raised in reply to the show cause notice, and did not meaningfully deal with other contentions was treated as a non-speaking order. The matter was remanded with directions to pass a reasoned order after considering all objections raised, decide the dispute in accordance with law, and grant an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:45:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 208 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82414</link>
      <description>An adjudication order that failed to address the appellants&#039; limitation plea, raised in reply to the show cause notice, and did not meaningfully deal with other contentions was treated as a non-speaking order. The matter was remanded with directions to pass a reasoned order after considering all objections raised, decide the dispute in accordance with law, and grant an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>