<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 135 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the jurisdictional validity of a supplementary assessment order passed by the Assistant Collector and the classification of imported goods under the Customs and Excise Tariff. The Tribunal held that the order was irregular but not void ab initio, setting aside the arguments on jurisdiction. Additionally, it found that the goods should not have been classified under Item 37AA of C.E.T. and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:20:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 135 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the jurisdictional validity of a supplementary assessment order passed by the Assistant Collector and the classification of imported goods under the Customs and Excise Tariff. The Tribunal held that the order was irregular but not void ab initio, setting aside the arguments on jurisdiction. Additionally, it found that the goods should not have been classified under Item 37AA of C.E.T. and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>