<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 134 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of &#039;Chironjidana&#039;, Ghadi-sakkar, Rewadi, and Gathi/Batasha under sub-heading 1704.90 as sugar confectionery. The appeals by the assessee were rejected, and the appeal by the Department was allowed. The lower authorities were directed to consider the eligibility for exemptions under the relevant notifications and re-determine the duty liability accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:17:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 134 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of &#039;Chironjidana&#039;, Ghadi-sakkar, Rewadi, and Gathi/Batasha under sub-heading 1704.90 as sugar confectionery. The appeals by the assessee were rejected, and the appeal by the Department was allowed. The lower authorities were directed to consider the eligibility for exemptions under the relevant notifications and re-determine the duty liability accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>