https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82393 Conviction for illegal possession of opium was sustained where the seizure memo, chemical identification of the substance as opium, and the unchallenged testimony of the principal witness together established possession, and there was no material suggesting false implication or animus. The rejection of one supporting witness did not undermine proof of the offence. Revisional interference with sentence was declined because the punishment was not shown to be excessive or harsh, and the sentence was maintained. en-us Tue, 03 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:36:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82393 Conviction for illegal possession of opium was sustained where the seizure memo, chemical identification of the substance as opium, and the unchallenged testimony of the principal witness together established possession, and there was no material suggesting false implication or animus. The rejection of one supporting witness did not undermine proof of the offence. Revisional interference with sentence was declined because the punishment was not shown to be excessive or harsh, and the sentence was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82393