<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 200 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82387</link>
    <description>The amended refund requirements under Section 11B apply only after a refund claim is otherwise admissible on merits. The appellate authority could not direct fresh refund claims on the assumption that merits had already been decided, because the appeals themselves had not been disposed of on merits or on limitation. The proper course was to examine the existing record and decide the appeals on all relevant issues first, including admissibility and time bar, before considering compliance with the amended refund procedure. The order directing fresh claims was therefore set aside and the matters were remanded for decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:03:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 200 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82387</link>
      <description>The amended refund requirements under Section 11B apply only after a refund claim is otherwise admissible on merits. The appellate authority could not direct fresh refund claims on the assumption that merits had already been decided, because the appeals themselves had not been disposed of on merits or on limitation. The proper course was to examine the existing record and decide the appeals on all relevant issues first, including admissibility and time bar, before considering compliance with the amended refund procedure. The order directing fresh claims was therefore set aside and the matters were remanded for decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>