<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82374</link>
    <description>Flavoured soya milk beverages made from soya base were held outside the exemption for &quot;soya milk&quot; in Notifications No. 286/86 and 20/89 because the processed product was distinct from soya milk simpliciter after blending with sugar, flavour, colour and stabiliser. Contemporaneous materials and departmental clarification supported that construction, so the duty demand on merits survived. On limitation and penalty, prior disclosure of the product, manufacturing process and exemption claim negatived suppression, so the extended period was not sustained; the penal consequence was therefore moderated, with the penalty reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 16:32:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82374</link>
      <description>Flavoured soya milk beverages made from soya base were held outside the exemption for &quot;soya milk&quot; in Notifications No. 286/86 and 20/89 because the processed product was distinct from soya milk simpliciter after blending with sugar, flavour, colour and stabiliser. Contemporaneous materials and departmental clarification supported that construction, so the duty demand on merits survived. On limitation and penalty, prior disclosure of the product, manufacturing process and exemption claim negatived suppression, so the extended period was not sustained; the penal consequence was therefore moderated, with the penalty reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>