<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 199 - CEGAT, NFW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay application concerning the Collector (Allahabad)&#039;s order dated 6-4-1992, as the appellants no longer sought a stay on the Collector (Appeals) order following the Tribunal&#039;s resolution of a classification dispute on 21-9-1992. The appellants requested the return of unlawfully collected amounts and expedited hearing, citing the Court&#039;s inherent powers. The Tribunal emphasized that the impact of the 21-9-1992 order on the present case should be assessed during the hearing, not at the current stage. The Tribunal advised the appellants to address any compliance issues with the Assistant Collector&#039;s actions through appropriate channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 199 - CEGAT, NFW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay application concerning the Collector (Allahabad)&#039;s order dated 6-4-1992, as the appellants no longer sought a stay on the Collector (Appeals) order following the Tribunal&#039;s resolution of a classification dispute on 21-9-1992. The appellants requested the return of unlawfully collected amounts and expedited hearing, citing the Court&#039;s inherent powers. The Tribunal emphasized that the impact of the 21-9-1992 order on the present case should be assessed during the hearing, not at the current stage. The Tribunal advised the appellants to address any compliance issues with the Assistant Collector&#039;s actions through appropriate channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>