<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82270</link>
    <description>Seized man-made fabrics found without valid GP 1 or gate pass documents were treated as part of clandestine removal, so confiscation and duty demand were sustained because the goods were not accounted for in statutory records and no duty had been paid. The contention that the duty liability should fall on the processors was rejected. As the goods had already been redeemed on payment of duty and redemption fine, the penalty was found excessive and reduced to Rs. 3,500.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:45:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82270</link>
      <description>Seized man-made fabrics found without valid GP 1 or gate pass documents were treated as part of clandestine removal, so confiscation and duty demand were sustained because the goods were not accounted for in statutory records and no duty had been paid. The contention that the duty liability should fall on the processors was rejected. As the goods had already been redeemed on payment of duty and redemption fine, the penalty was found excessive and reduced to Rs. 3,500.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>