<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82262</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the relevant date for determining the rate of import duty is the vessel&#039;s entry inwards, as per Section 15 of the Customs Act. The decision aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation and rejected the appellants&#039; argument based on the initial entry into Indian waters, emphasizing the importance of following the prescribed procedure under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:33:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82262</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the relevant date for determining the rate of import duty is the vessel&#039;s entry inwards, as per Section 15 of the Customs Act. The decision aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation and rejected the appellants&#039; argument based on the initial entry into Indian waters, emphasizing the importance of following the prescribed procedure under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>