<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 225 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82245</link>
    <description>Waste or scrap arising from manufacture could be cleared duty-free only if it was covered by a specific Central Government order under the relevant sub-rule. The earlier ruling treated that mechanism as mandatory, so a manufacturer could not rely on general Board instructions or on an analogy with aluminium scrap to extend duty-free treatment to other scrap. On that reasoning, silicon steel scrap sent to job workers for re-melting did not qualify for clearance without duty, and the prior appellate order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:24:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 225 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82245</link>
      <description>Waste or scrap arising from manufacture could be cleared duty-free only if it was covered by a specific Central Government order under the relevant sub-rule. The earlier ruling treated that mechanism as mandatory, so a manufacturer could not rely on general Board instructions or on an analogy with aluminium scrap to extend duty-free treatment to other scrap. On that reasoning, silicon steel scrap sent to job workers for re-melting did not qualify for clearance without duty, and the prior appellate order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>