<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (12) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82223</link>
    <description>Imports exceeding the minimum quantity attracted a variable supplier discount, and that discount had been overlooked in the earlier valuation exercise. On reconsideration, the declared invoice price was found consistent with the appellants&#039; claim after allowing the quantity discount, so the invoice price was accepted as the assessable value. As the valuation basis was corrected to reflect the discount, the redemption fine was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (12) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82223</link>
      <description>Imports exceeding the minimum quantity attracted a variable supplier discount, and that discount had been overlooked in the earlier valuation exercise. On reconsideration, the declared invoice price was found consistent with the appellants&#039; claim after allowing the quantity discount, so the invoice price was accepted as the assessable value. As the valuation basis was corrected to reflect the discount, the redemption fine was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>