<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 236 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the import of goods under Project Import. The Custom House&#039;s appropriation of Rs. 20 lakhs without finalizing the assessment was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities, emphasizing the necessity to finalize assessment before enforcing bond terms. The case was remanded for re-examination by the Assistant Collector, stressing cooperation between both parties in the assessment process. The appellants&#039; financial hardship and lack of justification for the demand led to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 236 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the import of goods under Project Import. The Custom House&#039;s appropriation of Rs. 20 lakhs without finalizing the assessment was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities, emphasizing the necessity to finalize assessment before enforcing bond terms. The case was remanded for re-examination by the Assistant Collector, stressing cooperation between both parties in the assessment process. The appellants&#039; financial hardship and lack of justification for the demand led to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>