https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82192 Import policy amendments and the contemporaneous public notice made goods freely importable by deleting the relevant OGL appendices and excluding them from the negative list, so customs could not treat olive oil as a restricted consumer good on a contrary reading. The Court held that the customs authorities had to follow the construction adopted by the import and export authorities and that refusal of clearance was unjustified. The alternative remedy objection failed because there was no written appealable order, and the objections based on estoppel and policy were rejected. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:53:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82192 Import policy amendments and the contemporaneous public notice made goods freely importable by deleting the relevant OGL appendices and excluding them from the negative list, so customs could not treat olive oil as a restricted consumer good on a contrary reading. The Court held that the customs authorities had to follow the construction adopted by the import and export authorities and that refusal of clearance was unjustified. The alternative remedy objection failed because there was no written appealable order, and the objections based on estoppel and policy were rejected. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82192