<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82169</link>
    <description>HDPE tapes/strips were held classifiable under Heading 3920.32, following binding High Court authority and Tribunal precedent, so the department&#039;s contrary classification could not stand. The Modvat claim and exemption claims were remitted for fresh adjudication because they had not been examined by the lower authority and required factual and legal scrutiny on the corrected classification basis. The plea of limitation was also left open for determination in the de novo proceedings, as it depended on the facts to be assessed on remand. The matter was therefore partly settled on classification and otherwise remitted for reconsideration of relief and time-bar issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82169</link>
      <description>HDPE tapes/strips were held classifiable under Heading 3920.32, following binding High Court authority and Tribunal precedent, so the department&#039;s contrary classification could not stand. The Modvat claim and exemption claims were remitted for fresh adjudication because they had not been examined by the lower authority and required factual and legal scrutiny on the corrected classification basis. The plea of limitation was also left open for determination in the de novo proceedings, as it depended on the facts to be assessed on remand. The matter was therefore partly settled on classification and otherwise remitted for reconsideration of relief and time-bar issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>